<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Equivalences of the Choi-Jamiolkowski Isomorphism (Part I)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nathanieljohnston.com/2009/10/the-equivalences-of-the-choi-jamiolkowski-isomorphism-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nathanieljohnston.com/2009/10/the-equivalences-of-the-choi-jamiolkowski-isomorphism-part-i/</link>
	<description>A blog of recreational math and quantum information theory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:30:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanieljohnston.com/2009/10/the-equivalences-of-the-choi-jamiolkowski-isomorphism-part-i/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanieljohnston.com/?p=786#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the correction, Abel. I meant to say &quot;in&quot; Mn ⊗ Mm instead of &quot;on&quot; Mn ⊗ Mm there -- it is fixed now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the correction, Abel. I meant to say &#8220;in&#8221; Mn ⊗ Mm instead of &#8220;on&#8221; Mn ⊗ Mm there &#8212; it is fixed now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abel</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanieljohnston.com/2009/10/the-equivalences-of-the-choi-jamiolkowski-isomorphism-part-i/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Abel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 05:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanieljohnston.com/?p=786#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Maybe I am wrong, but it seems to me that in:

&quot;it follows that the set of all linear maps from Mn to Mm corresponds to the set of all linear operators on Mn ⊗ Mm&quot;

it should say at the end Cn ⊗ Cm (where by C I mean the Complex numbers)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I am wrong, but it seems to me that in:</p>
<p>&#8220;it follows that the set of all linear maps from Mn to Mm corresponds to the set of all linear operators on Mn ⊗ Mm&#8221;</p>
<p>it should say at the end Cn ⊗ Cm (where by C I mean the Complex numbers)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel Johnston &#187; The Other Superoperator Isomorphism</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanieljohnston.com/2009/10/the-equivalences-of-the-choi-jamiolkowski-isomorphism-part-i/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Johnston &#187; The Other Superoperator Isomorphism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanieljohnston.com/?p=786#comment-152</guid>
		<description>[...] few months ago, I spent two posts describing the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism between linear operators from Mn to Mm (often [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few months ago, I spent two posts describing the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism between linear operators from Mn to Mm (often [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel Johnston &#187; The Equivalences of the Choi-Jamiolkowski Isomorphism (Part II)</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanieljohnston.com/2009/10/the-equivalences-of-the-choi-jamiolkowski-isomorphism-part-i/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Johnston &#187; The Equivalences of the Choi-Jamiolkowski Isomorphism (Part II)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanieljohnston.com/?p=786#comment-151</guid>
		<description>[...] is a continuation of this post. Please read that post to learn what the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a continuation of this post. Please read that post to learn what the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
